As I watched the video "A Good Dad" I saw many exceptional areas, and areas for improvement. As the video started There was not title. A title usually opens up a story so they should of added one. Throughout the video the persons voice is easily heard, but isn't backed up by background music. The movie seemed boring, though his message was well expressed in the video. The videos picture qualities are both eceptional, and need improvement. Some pictures were easily seen, but others were blrry. Overall the video was good with giving out the message, but lacked picture quality, and the ability to make your video come to life.

As i was watching "A Good Dad" I realized many mistakes such as he didn't go over his script before reading it on camera. He, also, didn't tell us who was saying what.The pictures weren't very descriptive and there was very little of them. He had extremely long pauses in which you could hear him swallow and put something down. He had no music to make the video more interesting. His tone didn't invoke any emotion. Over all this video was very poor and it looks like the boy didn't put any effort into it.

Watching the video, "A Good Dad" the cons seemed to outweigh the pros. The narator's voice was very low.He seemed like he had a good idea for a video but it fell through, due to lack of editing it.His images were very unclear.No background music was added, so it made the video even more dull. Since his narating voice was low, there was also no captions to even help understand what he was saying.Over-all he seemed had a good idea for a video, it just wasn't put together correctly.

As I was watching the video "A Good Dad" I had noticed that he was unclear, and had stuttered a lot (although he probably couldn't help it much), it seemed as though he had a great idea for making the video but it wasn't very well put together. He didn't specify who was talking to his future self with something like "He said" "And then I replied saying" which it may make it hard for a person to follow who was saying what. He could of made this video much better given the time that he made this in.

The video "A Good Dad" seemed to have both cons and pros to the speakers message. The pros of this video is that the speaker had a powerful message that he wanted his audience to be aware of, and he used a wide variety of pictures to match what he was saying. However, the video has many cons because he lacked great communicational skills that is the key to keeping an audience intrigued with the video. Throughout the video, the speaker was constantly stuttering, making me confused as to what his actual message was. Because of this the pacing was so sluggish, that it became excruciating to watch. Not only did he repeat the same words and phrases, he was monotone, making it even more dreadful. To make his message as powerful as it should've been, he should improve on his communication and pacing to keep the attention of his audience.

While watching the video, "A Good Dad" I noticed that there was multiple mistakes. One of these mistakes was the narrators voice. The narrator stuttered a lot and it ruined the pacing of the video. Because of this, I couldn't focus on anything else but the narrator's tone and sluggish pacing. I didn't understand what the message was because I didn't quite understand him. Another con was the dialogue confusion. In the digital story he impersonates two dads, but he did not make this clear. Despite this mistake, the concept of the video was good, it just wasn't put together well.

"the good dad" had a fantastic story line.athough the story line was good he still made so many mistakes. he couldof practiced the script he had wrote more because he repeated many lines from the script.

"The Good Dad" is a very emotional piece. The point of view of the student who made this video was very clear about what a good dad is. while watching this video i couldnt help but notice a few mistakes. One of the mistakes the student made was note practicing his script. The out come was obvious, he studdered over everyline which made it hard to understand. On the flip side the student audio was set right, it wasnt too high or too low. The student used a number of photos to establish a emotional setting. He also used music to help set the tone of the story towards the end. The pacing of the video was okay, he kept the same flow from the begining of the video.The student voice also played a big rule in the video, you could hear the sadness and distress in his voice. Overall this was a good video but the only thing that this student needs to work on is practicing his script and speak clearly so his viewers can comprehend.

While watching "A Good Dad" I found myself having to rewind it often so I could actually understand what he was saying. He stuttered a lot which shows he did not go over his script, because it was clear he was reading off of something.I found there were more mistakes made, then there were expetional parts of this story. Overall I thought that it was a good story, it was sad but he made a strong emotional connection through his story because this was clearly a topic he was familar with.

While watching "A Good Dad" there were some weaknesses to his digital story. The voice was not good, it was low and hard to understand at times. Also the pictures were on the screen for a very long time which made it very boring to wacth.At the same time the narrator had some exceptional parts to his video as well. The boy got his point across which set the mood to his digital story.

In the digital story "A Good Dad", a powerful message is sent to the viewers, with the usage of a good script. However, this great message was hard to understand due to the narrator's constant stuttering and unclear voice. At times it was hard to understand him, and the pacing was quite slow. The pictures matched up well with the story. The emotional content was suspenseful and sad. Overall, most aspects of the video were strong except for the narration.

While I was watching "A Good Dad," It was hard understanding what he was trying to say because his voice was not so clear.I feel that he should've put background music to create the mood and more dramatic. The pacing is alright because the pictures relate to what he is saying but at times, he goes really fast then really slow. I think he should've rehearsed the script a few times before making this video because he kept messing up/stuttering. Overall, he should've rehearsed so no mistakes were done but the effort was there.

In this video "A Good Dad". The kid talked about an emotional event that happen in his life. The way the kid said his story made it very easy to visualize what was going on. He made it difficult to understand what he was saying at times. But overall the boy did a good job sending the message as to what he his trying to say. The kid kept the mood of the story by constantly sounding depressed.

After watching, "A Good Dad" i saw great emtion filled within the video. This must've been boy scard from the experiences his father left him with. He took his life and showed himslef and the audience what a good dad would do. I liked how he waited towards the end to put his soundtrack on becuase it wouldnt have fit during the dialouge. The dialouge was unique and interesting. The pacing was fine, and the pictures matched with his story line. He used both storymapping and boarding to complete his video but he could've reheasred the script a little bit more.

As i was watched the video "A Good Dad", i felt that the person was trying there best to put a video together to make a personal future life story of a new opening world, full of a new ideas, problems,and happiness. but, the video itself could of been better. some of the problems were the speaker,and alittle bit of the pictures.:)

While watching the video, "A Good Dad", there was a bit of both good and bad moments.

The narration wasn't that good, but the powerful message that the boy had to convey in the video out weighed the narration. The quality wasn't that good, but putting myself in his shoes isn't something I'd like to do. It was moving, but still could've been better.

While watching "A Good Dad" I noticed many aspects that could've been better. For one, the narration was hard to understand; I found I had to turn the volume of my computer all the way up to understand, and sometimes I had to rewind. In addition, the pace was rather slow, as the author had the pictures up for way too long. However, the most outstanding aspect of the video was the emotions that the narrator gave off, and I found it sad. I can tell that he feels very strong about this topic.

As I watched the video "A Good Dad" I recongized many positive points, and also some that need improvement. Until the end of the video I was very confused about the story, and I was even more confused because of his unclear voice, and stuttering. I found the pictures to be too simple for such a touching story. The emotional content in the video was strong, because of the way the narrator connected to his audience. Overall, I found the video to have a strong message, but needed much improvement in the voice, narration and pictures.

The video, "A Good Dad," had many positive aspects as well as areas that need improvement. The strongest part of this video was the pacing. There were times when it was too slow; but overall, it was decent. The Creator should have practiced his lines more, and tried to make the audio flow a little better. At first I couldn't understand what the story was about; but in the end, the Creator cleared up all my questions. Some might not like this strategy, but it helped to keep my attention. Overall, it was a well made video.

I've watched many videos throughout my life that range from being absolute masterpieces to complete failures. "A Good Dad" is one of those videos that I believe is more on the masterpiece side of this spectrum. While the Creator's Voice is a bit slow, his Point of View, Emotional Content, and Dramatic Question make up for it. His POV is of a bad father who goes through a metamorphosis, realizing that his drinking will not only send him to his grave one day, but will also cause him to lose his family. The Emotional Content he has in his video is shown when he realizes that he could disappear from his only son's life and miss important family moments; like his son's wedding. Finally, what made me watch this video, despite the low technology that was used, was the Dramatic Question; which made me think "how is this going to end for this guy?". Not only is the POV, Emotional Content, and Dramatic Question great, the Economy and Pacing(not counting his voice's pacing)were great as well. He managed to tell his story in a well organized manner, he fit the story into 3 minutes(the average length of a video), and as he told his story he used images to give the viewers a good visual of what was going on. I've seen a lot of videos that have special effects to try making the video "better", but, while "A Good Dad" is not the greatest video I've ever watched, it does prove that sometimes "less is more".

When I watched the video "Good Dad" I realized that there was many issues going on during the video. There was a lot of problem but I think the main concern was the pacing, the narrator should have went over the lines for the story a little bit more before the final edit of the video was published. I had a problem understanding what the narrator said

While watching " A Good Dad" I have notcied a lot of mishaps. It was a very good video content wise, however it was a bit understandable. He stuttered a lot and there were some computer noises in the backround. It seemed as if he just threw the video together last minute. The overall key on how the father was suppose to be angry and turned out to overcome his guilt is a great idea. I was lost in the beginning were he stated he was a angry dad, yet his tone was not angry. It would be a very well done story if it was maped out and story boarded.

As I was watching the video, "A Good Dad" I noticed that the video had more negatives than positives. The boy making the video was very unclear and seemed unprepared to use dialogue in the story. He also had trouble with pictures and cropping them out to better fit the screen. He did include a title page which helped out the video. Even though they were hard to understand, his words had a lot of meaning behind them. His story truly portrayed his emotion but he had a hard time exerting his emotion through technology, which is something he needs to work on to be a digital storyteller.

As i watched the digital story "A Good Dad" i noticed many errors. Most of the script is not well thought out or re-read. It was very slow paced and did not hold the viewers attention. The quality with sound and voice could have been better and it also lacked a title opening image. It was confusing and although it held a deeper meaning for the creator it wasn't as emotional for the viewer because of the way the video was put together.

while watching "a Good Dad" I noticed areas of improvment and areas of excellence. although, it was hard to understand the voice of the person because they were speaking to low and not very clearly, they had a good central message. What they were saying had good emotional content. the pictures represented his story well but were on the screen for too long. the pacing was to slow in voice and in image. the quality of voice and images could also have been better. the story needed music and more images. the person could have put captions in which would have made it easier for the viewer to understand the video.

while i was watching "A Good Dad" it was a very emotional story. the only thing is that the narrator didn't speak clearly he stuttered a lot. overall it was a good story and was very descriptive i could actually imagine what was going on in my head. also the pictures matched well with the story he was telling.

The video "A Good Dad" had many exceptional areas, but also some that needed some improvement. There was not any title screen in this movie. The movies Emotional Content was very exceptional cause they really brought you into their life story and it was depressing. The pictures worked very well expressing their emotion. The pacing was very good, although he showed no emotion. It was boring to listen to, and I lost my attention. The sound quality could have been a little better, but for the most part, this video got the point across and it's deeper meaning.

the video "good dad" had many good areas and positive things about it. But! like any good video could have been improved.The speaker for one was very clear but the pace of his voice was so slow i felt bored through out the video. Not only that he also didn't have any music to help the video keep the viewers attention, especially in areas that he could have changed the way he spoke, or bring out scenes that are more important to the video.

I feel that the film "A Good Dad" was a very moving media piece, but it had some areas that did require improvement. Perhaps that most apparent would be the lack of a title. A title is necessary and can be found in almost all video projects and movies. I also felt that the narrator's voice was too quiet. He should speak up and put more effort into his voice. The lack of visual transitions was also an eyesore of sorts. Without transitions, the video doesn't seem to flow from one scene to another as smoothly as it should. The lack of background music also created an awkward lack of ambiance that failed to keep me interested in what was going on on screen. Although there were many areas for improvement, the video was very moving and I found it to be a very emotional piece.

This video was very touching. I liked a lot when he used the two points of view in the wedding scene...that was very good. The narrator did not have the greatest gift of voice but he had a lot of emotion in what he was trying to say so it made up for the voice problems

When I was watching the video "A Good Dad" there were some pros and cons. I have noticed that the tone of the voice was slow only because of his pauses before he went on with what he would have said next. His purpose for making this video was a good itention because he wanted to describe something personal, but how he put the video together was not very proper. He didnt really keep the viewers attention.

as i was watching the video "a good dad" the voice was not clear it was brooking up but was good b/c it set the mood on the video and the porson that mad the video mad his pont if it was not for the flash of light we would not have saw what his family life was with out him his family would come aport and his son would not have a dad figure

Watching "A Good Dad" i felt like as he told his story you definetly felt his emotion even through all of the constant stuttering,athough he tried Not all of images related well with his story and without there being any words to go along with images, made his digital story more difficult to understand. Also it didnt really sound Like he scripted his story well at all it almost seems like he was reading a new book for the first time.And trying to understand the story himself while he was telling it to his audience. at the end of his video his choice of music was really irrelavent and since he didnt use music in the beginning of his video i dont think he should of used it all. overall i was a little sadden by his story although he could have set the mood more to keep the listeners interest.But it seem like he will grow up to be a great dad one day !!

While watching the digital story, "A Good Dad" i noticed many pros and cons. Although he made a very good point and did a great job of adding emotion to his story, he could've improved in many areas. His script was a little sketchy and he sounded like he didn't have it rehearsed too much. But he made his point clear and used good pictures to help better tell his story.